Parts 1 and 2  have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted. 

Parts 2 and 3  have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted. 

APA format

1) Minimum 8 pages  (No word count per page)-   Follow the 3 x 3 rule: minimum of three paragraphs per page 

You must strictly comply with the number of paragraphs requested per page.  

The number of words in each paragraph should be similar

         Part 1: minimum 2 pages

         Part 2: minimum 2 pages

         Part 3: minimum 2 pages

         Part 4: minimum 2 pages

Submit 1 document per part

2)¨******APA norms

        The number of words in each paragraph should be similar

        Must be written in the third person

         All paragraphs must be narrative and cited in the text- each paragraph

         The writing must be coherent, using connectors or conjunctive to extend, add information, or contrast information. 

         Bulleted responses are not accepted

         Don’t write in the first person 

         Do not use subtitles or titles      

         Don’t copy and paste the questions.

         Answer the question objectively, do not make introductions to your answers, answer it when you start the paragraph

Submit 1 document per part

3)****************************** It will be verified by Turnitin (Identify the percentage of exact match of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks) 

********************************It will be verified by SafeAssign (Identify the percentage of similarity of writing with any other resource on the internet and academic sources, including universities and data banks)

4) Minimum 3 references (APA format) per part not older than 5 years  (Journals, books) (No websites)

All references must be consistent with the topic-purpose-focus of the parts. Different references are not allowed 

5) Identify your answer with the numbers, according to the question. Start your answer on the same line, not the next

 Example:

Q 1. Nursing is XXXXX

Q 2. Health is XXXX

Q3. Research is…………………………………………………. (a) The relationship between……… (b) EBI has to

6) You must name the files according to the part you are answering: 

Example:

Part 1.doc 

Part 2.doc

__________________________________________________________________________________

 

Parts 1 and 2  have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted. 

The number of words in each paragraph should be similar

Part 1: Inclusive recreation services

Topic: Responding to Disability

Take the questionnaire (14 questions) and check the file attached and scroll down to look at the “answers” the authors gave and also read their explanations. 

1. According to the answer you gave (only the letter) indicate if you agreed or disagreed with the author’s answers and briefly explain why you agreed or disagreed (Four paragraphs)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2. According to scenarios 1 and 2  described in the questionnaire

a.Select concepts and explain why these concepts are the most indicated: stigma, stereotype, discrimination, segregation, self-fulfilling prophecy, spread phenomenon, and/or over-exaggeration assumption. (Two paragraphs: One paragraph for 1; One paragraph for 2)

Part 2: Inclusive recreation services

Topic: Responding to Disability

Take the questionnaire (14 questions) and check the file attached and scroll down to look at the “answers” the authors gave and also read their explanations. 

1. According to the answer you gave (only the letter) indicate if you agreed or disagreed with the author’s answers and briefly explain why you agreed or disagreed (Four paragraphs)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

2. According to scenarios 1 and 2  described in the questionnaire

a.Select concepts and explain why these concepts are the most indicated: stigma, stereotype, discrimination, segregation, self-fulfilling prophecy, spread phenomenon, and/or over-exaggeration assumption. (Two paragraphs: One paragraph for 1; One paragraph for 2)

Parts 2 and 3  have the same questions. However, you must answer with references and different writing, always addressing them objectively, as if you were different students. Similar responses in wording or references will not be accepted. 

Part 3: Psychopathology

Topic: Ethical Decision making in Psychiatry.

Using the following readings, please discuss the following prompts:

Digital Psychiatry: Risks and Opportunities for Public Health and Well-Being 

https://philpapers.org/archive/BURDPE.pdf

Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: An Overview

 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274446/

 Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review

 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993/full

1. What is the risk of using digital psychiatry on patients’ autonomy? (One paragraph)

2. Does the passive collection of data impact a user’s ability to participate in the decision-making process? (One paragraph)

3. What is the inherent risk of using AI for making diagnosis? (One paragraph)

a. What are the patient rights that may be violated?

4. What is the rational argument for conducting online psychotherapy? (One paragraph)

5. When look through the ethical paradigm What are the possible ethical issues that may become against offering this modality to patients? (One paragraph)

6. How the digital psychiatry and AI related to DSM-5 (One paragraph)

Part 4: Psychopathology

Topic: Ethical Decision making in Psychiatry.

Using the following readings, please discuss the following prompts:

Digital Psychiatry: Risks and Opportunities for Public Health and Well-Being 

https://philpapers.org/archive/BURDPE.pdf

Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: An Overview

 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7274446/

 Ethical Issues in Online Psychotherapy: A Narrative Review

 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00993/full

1. What is the risk of using digital psychiatry on patients’ autonomy? (One paragraph)

2. Does the passive collection of data impact a user’s ability to participate in the decision-making process? (One paragraph)

3. What is the inherent risk of using AI for making diagnosis? (One paragraph)

a. What are the patient rights that may be violated?

4. What is the rational argument for conducting online psychotherapy? (One paragraph)

5. When look through the ethical paradigm What are the possible ethical issues that may become against offering this modality to patients? (One paragraph)

6. How the digital psychiatry and AI related to DSM-5 (One paragraph)

This document was taken from the link http://www.in.gov/gpcpd/2349.htm for better viewing purposes.

Responding to Disability: A Question of Attitude

This questionnaire is designed to stimulate thinking and dialogue. It is not intended to test knowledge of disability or

attitudes toward people with disabilities. As people increasingly find themselves in situations involving people who are

disabled they need to make quick decisions on how to respond. This questionnaire provides an opportunity to think

about situations involving people with disabilities, to respond, and then to consider the various responses more

carefully.

Responding to Disability: A Question of Attitude

Written by Patricia Hague

produced by

Minnesota State Council on Disabilities

208 Metro Square Building

St. Paul, MN 55101

612/296-6785 or

1-800/652-9747

Toll Free Voice and TDD

edited by

Indiana Governors Planning Council for People With Disabilities

Note: I would like to take this opportunity to extend my gratitude to the Center for Education for Non-Traditional

Students for their support during much of the time I was writing this questionnaire. Their encouragement and

thoughtful feedback were valuable in the development of these questions and answers. In particular, I would like to

thank Sandra Gish for her assistance with the development of question number ten. I would especially like to thank

Jerry Bergdahl, Gary TeGrootenhuis, Jeanne-Marie Moore, Kay Stoll and Alice Nelson for teaching me most of what I

know about disabilities and for giving me plenty of opportunities to improve my awareness of and attitudes toward

disabilities. – Patricia Hague

Copyright 1982

Minnesota Council on Disabilities

If interested in reproducing all or part of this booklet, contact the Minnesota State Council on Disabilities, 208

Metro Square, St. Paul, MN 55101, for permission.

(Editors note: With permission, this document has been edited to ensure that it reflects people first language.

Permission has been granted to reproduce this document or any portion thereof so long as proper credit is

given to the author.)

INTRODUCTION

With the recent changes in laws, opportunities, and attitudes, more people with disabilities are moving into the

mainstream, pursuing education, employment, and leisure activities. Yet few of us have had extensive

exposure to people with disabilities. Despite our desires to respond appropriately when we interact with a

person who has a disability, sometimes there is confusion, hesitancy or miscommunication.

This questionnaire is designed to stim