READ AND FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS

Answer on your own words.  PLEASE SEE ATTACHED ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS AND READ THEM CAREFULLY. FOLLOW THEM . PLEASE PLEASE. See attached resources for consultation and reference. Single space.

Provide a Bibliography or Works Consulted List. Include all the sources that I have assigned you above, including the books of the Bible, the Quran, the Sirat Rasul Allah, the illustrated biography of the Buddha, Buddha video ( (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B1Qhja4OhdM) ), our Partridge and Dowley textbook, as well as the other sources that you consult. Perhaps, you will consult your pastor or a scriptural commentary; if so, then include that interview and/or source in your bibliography.   

Type it according to Chicago-Turabian style, as best you can. 

Founders’ Questionable Ethics

Instructions: First, in your own words, provide a concise but thorough description of each action or teaching listed below. Second, in your own words, evaluate each action or teaching from a moral/ethical perspective. In your moral evaluation, you may employ emotive and even disapproving language if it befits the action or teaching under consideration. Type your answers in full sentences and employ good grammar. Single space your answers. Do your best. Your professor is aware that you are probably not a religious historian.

[When appropriate, do your best to take into account the possible gap between literal and figurative language. Also consider the fact that meticulous historians (who seek to determine the literal or figurative intent of exhortations) examine the extent to which the disciples of religious and political leaders have literally applied their leaders’ exhortations. In other words, if they interpreted the message literally, then many of the fervent followers would literally obey the message.]

It appears impossible to ethically evaluate the founder(s) of Hinduism because Vyasa Krishna Dwaipayana was the chief compiler and editor of Hinduism’s most important sacred books, but probably not Hinduism’s founder. In the case of Yehoshua (Jesus) min Natzaret, since there is probably no reliable record of his immoral actions, we have to examine his controversial words instead. If you disagree with that claim, please feel free to present your view with buttressing sources.

This assignment is an analytical exercise for adults. This assignment is not meant to weaken anyone’s faith. This is an exposition of the imperfect nature of perhaps otherwise admirable spiritual pioneers. Perhaps these historical accounts generally point to the importance of repentance followed by spiritual and moral growth. Please keep in mind that the scriptural and historical records also meritoriously emphasize the applied virtues of these historical people who founded the Planet Earth’s major religions. Siddattha spent his life traveling and showing people how to suffer less. Avraham implored HaShem to spare the guilty people of a city from destruction. Mosheh confronted a king and liberated his people from slavery. Yehoshua taught people to love and pray for their enemies, even to the point of beseeching HaShem to pardon and save his own torturers and executioners. Muhammad outlawed female infanticide. Nevertheless, let us not immaturely choose to ignore their recorded shortcomings by blindly pretending that they all lived their entire lives perfectly. By the way, you are permitted to disagree with this perspective. Your moral evaluations do not need to coincide with the unstated opinions of your professor in order to earn a good grade. Nonetheless, you must complete this report in order to successfully complete this course.

1-Read about what Siddattha Gotama (the

Founders’ Questionable Ethics

Instructions: First, in your own words, provide a concise but thorough description of each action or teaching listed below. Second, in your own words, evaluate each action or teaching from a moral/ethical perspective. In your moral evaluation, you may employ emotive and even disapproving language if it befits the action or teaching under consideration. Type your answers in full sentences and employ good grammar. Single space your answers. Do your best. Your professor is aware that you are probably not a religious historian.

[When appropriate, do your best to take into account the possible gap between literal and figurative language. Also consider the fact that meticulous historians (who seek to determine the literal or figurative intent of exhortations) examine the extent to which the disciples of religious and political leaders have literally applied their leaders’ exhortations. In other words, if they interpreted the message literally, then many of the fervent followers would literally obey the message.]

It appears impossible to ethically evaluate the founder(s) of Hinduism because Vyasa Krishna Dwaipayana was the chief compiler and editor of Hinduism’s most important sacred books, but probably not Hinduism’s founder. In the case of Yehoshua (Jesus) min Natzaret, since there is probably no reliable record of his immoral actions, we have to examine his controversial words instead. If you disagree with that claim, please feel free to present your view with buttressing sources.

This assignment is an analytical exercise for adults. This assignment is not meant to weaken anyone’s faith. This is an exposition of the imperfect nature of perhaps otherwise admirable spiritual pioneers. Perhaps these historical accounts generally point to the importance of repentance followed by spiritual and moral growth. Please keep in mind that the scriptural and historical records also meritoriously emphasize the applied virtues of these historical people who founded the Planet Earth’s major religions. Siddattha spent his life traveling and showing people how to suffer less. Avraham implored HaShem to spare the guilty people of a city from destruction. Mosheh confronted a king and liberated his people from slavery. Yehoshua taught people to love and pray for their enemies, even to the point of beseeching HaShem to pardon and save his own torturers and executioners. Muhammad outlawed female infanticide. Nevertheless, let us not immaturely choose to ignore their recorded shortcomings by blindly pretending that they all lived their entire lives perfectly. By the way, you are permitted to disagree with this perspective. Your moral evaluations do not need to coincide with the unstated opinions of your professor in order to earn a good grade. Nonetheless, you must complete this report in order to successfully complete this course.

1-Read about what Siddattha Gotama (the

Founders’ Questionable Ethics

Instructions: First, in your own words, provide a concise but thorough description of each action or teaching listed

below. Second, in your own words, evaluate each action or teaching from a moral/ethical perspective. In your moral

evaluation, you may employ emotive and even disapproving language if it befits the action or teaching under

consideration. Type your answers in full sentences and employ good grammar. Single space your answers. Do your

best. Your professor is aware that you are probably not a religious historian.

[When appropriate, do your best to take into account the possible gap between literal and figurative language. Also

consider the fact that meticulous historians (who seek to determine the literal or figurative intent of exhortations)

examine the extent to which the disciples of religious and political leaders have literally applied their leaders’

exhortations. In other words, if they interpreted the message literally, then many of the fervent followers would literally

obey the message.]

It appears impossible to ethically evaluate the founder(s) of Hinduism because Vyasa Krishna Dwaipayana was the

chief compiler and editor of Hinduism’s most important sacred books, but probably not Hinduism’s founder. In the case

of Yehoshua (Jesus) min Natzaret, since there is probably no reliable record of his immoral actions, we have to

examine his controversial words instead. If you disagree with that claim, please feel free to present your view with

buttressing sources.

This assignment is an analytical exercise for adults. This assignment is not meant to weaken anyone’s faith. This is an

exposition of the imperfect nature of perhaps otherwise admirable spiritual pioneers. Perhaps these historical accounts

generally point to the importance of repentance followed by spiritual and moral growth. Please keep in mind that the

scriptural and historical records also meritoriously emphasize the applied virtues of these historical people who

founded the Planet Earth’s major religions. Siddattha spent his life traveling and showing people how to suffer less.

Avraham implored HaShem to spare the guilty people of a city from destruction. Mosheh confronted a king and

liberated his people from slavery. Yehoshua taught people to love and pray for their enemies, even to the point of

beseeching HaShem to pardon and save his own torturers and executioners. Muhammad outlawed female infanticide.

Nevertheless, let us not immaturely choose to ignore their recorded shortcomings by blindly pretending that they all

lived their entire lives perfectly. By the way, you are permitted to disagree with this perspective. Your moral

evaluations do not need to co

Founders’ Questionable Ethics

Instructions: First, in your own words, provide a concise but thorough description of each action or teaching listed

below. Second, in your own words, evaluate each action or teaching from a moral/ethical perspective. In your moral

evaluation, you may employ emotive and even disapproving language if it befits the action or teaching under

consideration. Type your answers in full sentences and employ good grammar. Single space your answers. Do your

best. Your professor is aware that you are probably not a religious historian.

[When appropriate, do your best to take into account the possible gap between literal and figurative language. Also

consider the fact that meticulous historians (who seek to determine the literal or figurative intent of exhortations)

examine the extent to which the disciples of religious and political leaders have literally applied their leaders’

exhortations. In other words, if they interpreted the message literally, then many of the fervent followers would literally

obey the message.]

It appears impossible to ethically evaluate the founder(s) of Hinduism because Vyasa Krishna Dwaipayana was the

chief compiler and editor of Hinduism’s most important sacred books, but probably not Hinduism’s founder. In the case

of Yehoshua (Jesus) min Natzaret, since there is probably no reliable record of his immoral actions, we have to

examine his controversial words instead. If you disagree with that claim, please feel free to present your view with

buttressing sources.

This assignment is an analytical exercise for adults. This assignment is not meant to weaken anyone’s faith. This is an

exposition of the imperfect nature of perhaps otherwise admirable spiritual pioneers. Perhaps these historical accounts

generally point to the importance of repentance followed by spiritual and moral growth. Please keep in mind that the

scriptural and historical records also meritoriously emphasize the applied virtues of these historical people who

founded the Planet Earth’s major religions. Siddattha spent his life traveling and showing people how to suffer less.

Avraham implored HaShem to spare the guilty people of a city from destruction. Mosheh confronted a king and

liberated his people from slavery. Yehoshua taught people to love and pray for their enemies, even to the point of

beseeching HaShem to pardon and save his own torturers and executioners. Muhammad outlawed female infanticide.

Nevertheless, let us not immaturely choose to ignore their recorded shortcomings by blindly pretending that they all

lived their entire lives perfectly. By the way, you are permitted to disagree with this perspective. Your moral

evaluations do not need to co