Evaluation Plan Project: Literature Review

Adventurous travelers may see their journey as an investigative effort to identify landmarks on their expedition. Similarly, evaluation is an investigative effort that attempts to identify the landmarks of merit, worth, and significance. Before fully refining the focus of any investigation or research individuals should attempt to determine the current state of affairs in their area of interest.

Researchers attempt to establish merit, worth, and significance applicable to other researchers, practitioners, and the body of knowledge. One of the most common ways to accomplish this is to conduct a literature review. A literature review allows one to take a “snapshot” of the established knowledge in a particular area. Using this snapshot, researchers can determine the merit of their research questions and how they may need to modify their research goals.

Key words: Electronic Health Records, Health Information Technology or HIT, Interoperability, Nursing

Required a 3-page literature review from SIX or more peer-reviewed articles that addresses the following:

· Synthesize the findings in the literature as they relate to the goal of INTEROPERABILITY within the health information technology and various hospitals.

· Explain the original conclusions that derived from the evidence gathered.

· Support the synthesis and conclusions using evidence from the literature.

I have attached few article for your review, but need to find more articles focused to the topic. 

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 1/4

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

Conduct a review
of literature
relevant to the
case you
selected and the
goals you
developed in
Week 5. Locate a
minimum of six
full-text research
articles to use in
your literature
review.

23 (23%) – 25
(25%)

Six appropriate
articles are
researched, and
one research
goal and one
viewpoint are
identi�ed
clearly with
speci�c detail
regarding how
system
implementation
evaluations
researched are
similar to the
selected model.

20 (20%) – 22
(22%)

Six appropriate
articles are
researched, and
one research
goal and one
viewpoint are
identi�ed with
some detail
regarding how
system
implementation
evaluations
researched are
similar to the
selected model.

18 (18%) – 19
(19%)

Three
approriate
articles are
researched, and
one research
goal and one
viewpoint are
identi�ed with
details
regarding how
system
implementation
evaluations
researched are
similar to the
selected model
that are vague,
inaccurate, or
omitted.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
Fewer than
three articles
are researched,
and/or articles
are
inappropriate.
Research goals,
viewpoints, or
details
regarding how
system
implementation
evaluations
researched are
similar to the
selected are
vague,
incomplete, or
missing.

Name: NURS_6541_Week6_Assignment_Rubric EXIT

Grid View List View

2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn

https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920715_1 2/4

  Excellent Good Fair Poor

In a 2- to 3-page
paper:

Synthesize the
�ndings in the
literature as they
relate to the case
you selected and
goals you
developed in
Week 5.

23 (23%) – 25
(25%)

The response
clearly,
accurately, and
with speci�c
detail
synthesizes six
research
articles as they
relate to the
selected case
and goals
developed.

20 (20%) – 22
(22%)

The response
synthesizes six
research
articles as they
relate to the
selected case
and goals
developed.

18 (18%) – 19
(19%)

The response
synthesizes
three research
articles with
vague or
inaccurate
details
regarding how
they relate to
the selected
case and goals
developed.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response
synthesizes
fewer than
three research
articles, and/or
provides vague,
incomplete, or
inaccurate
details
regarding how
they relate to
the selected
case and goals
developed.

Explain the
original
conclusions that
you derived from
the evidence you
gathered.

23 (23%) – 25
(25%)

The response
clearly,
accurately, and
with speci�c
detail explains
the o

Research and Applications

Piloting a model-to-data approach to enable predictive

analytics in health care through patient mortality

prediction

Timothy Bergquist
1,

*, Yao Yan
2,

*, Thomas Schaffter
3
, Thomas Yu

3
, Vikas Pejaver

1
,

Noah Hammarlund1, Justin Prosser4, Justin Guinney1,3, and Sean Mooney1

1Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 2Molecular Engineering

and Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA, 3Sage Bionetworks, Seattle, Washington, USA4Insti-

tute for Translational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

*These authors contributed equally.

Corresponding Author: Sean Mooney, PhD, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle,

WA 98195, USA; [email protected]

Received 11 December 2019; Revised 16 April 2020; Editorial Decision 20 April 2020; Accepted 6 May 2020

ABSTRACT

Objective: The development of predictive models for clinical application requires the availability of electronic

health record (EHR) data, which is complicated by patient privacy concerns. We showcase the “Model to Data”

(MTD) approach as a new mechanism to make private clinical data available for the development of predictive

models. Under this framework, we eliminate researchers’ direct interaction with patient data by delivering con-

tainerized models to the EHR data.

Materials and Methods: We operationalize the MTD framework using the Synapse collaboration platform and

an on-premises secure computing environment at the University of Washington hosting EHR data. Container-

ized mortality prediction models developed by a model developer, were delivered to the University of Washing-

ton via Synapse, where the models were trained and evaluated. Model performance metrics were returned to

the model developer.

Results: The model developer was able to develop 3 mortality prediction models under the MTD framework us-

ing simple demographic features (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.693), dem-

ographics and 5 common chronic diseases (AUROC, 0.861), and the 1000 most common features from the

EHR’s condition/procedure/drug domains (AUROC, 0.921).

Discussion: We demonstrate the feasibility of the MTD framework to facilitate the development of predictive

models on private EHR data, enabled by common data models and containerization software. We identify chal-

lenges that both the model developer and the health system information technology group encountered and

propose

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Medical Informatics

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijmedinf

Development and evaluation of an osteoarthritis risk model for integration
into primary care health information technology
Jason E. Blacka,*, Amanda L. Terryb, Daniel J. Lizottec
a Graduate Program in Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5C1, Canada
b Department of Family Medicine, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street,
London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada
c Department of Computer Science, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Department of Statistical and Actuarial
Sciences, 1151 Richmond Street, Western University, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada

A R T I C L E I N F O

Keywords:
Prognostic prediction model
Risk
Electronic medical record
Osteoarthritis
CPCSSN

A B S T R A C T

Background: We developed and evaluated a prognostic prediction model that estimates osteoarthritis risk for use
by patients and practitioners that is designed to be appropriate for integration into primary care health in-
formation technology systems. Osteoarthritis, a joint disorder characterized by pain and stiffness, causes sig-
nificant morbidity among older Canadians. Because our prognostic prediction model for osteoarthritis risk uses
data that are readily available in primary care settings, it supports targeting of interventions delivered as part of
clinical practice that are aimed at risk reduction.
Methods: We used the CPCSSN (Canadian Primary Sentinel Surveillance Network) database, which contains
aggregated electronic health information from a cohort of primary care practices, to develop and evaluate a
prognostic prediction model to estimate 5-year osteoarthritis risk, addressing contextual challenges of data
availability and missingness. We constructed a retrospective cohort of 383,117 eligible primary care patients
who were included in the cohort if they had an encounter with their primary care practitioner between 1
January 2009 and 31 December 2010. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis prior to
their first visit in this time period. Incident cases of osteoarthritis were observed. The model was constructed to
predict incident osteoarthritis based on age, sex, BMI, previous leg injury, and osteoporosis. Evaluation of the
model used internal 10-fold cross-validation; we argue that internal validation is particularly appropriate for a
model that is to be integrated into the same context from which the data were derived.
Results: The resulting prediction model for 5-year risk of osteoarthritis diagnosis demonstrated state-of-the-art
discrimination (estimated AUROC 0.84) and good calibration (asse

Research and Applications

Feasibility of capturing real-world data from health infor-

mation technology systems at multiple centers to assess

cardiac ablation device outcomes: A fit-for-purpose infor-

matics analysis report

Guoqian Jiang,
1

Sanket S. Dhruva ,
2

Jiajing Chen,
3

Wade L. Schulz,
4,5

Amit A. Doshi,
6

Peter A. Noseworthy,
7

Shumin Zhang,
8

Yue Yu,
9

H. Patrick Young ,
10

Eric Brandt,3 Keondae R. Ervin,11 Nilay D. Shah,12 Joseph S. Ross,5,10 Paul Coplan,13,14

and Joseph P. Drozda Jr 3

1Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, 2School of Medicine, University

of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA, 3Mercy Re-

search, Mercy, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA, 4Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Ha-

ven, Connecticut, USA, 5Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut,

USA, 6Mercy Clinic, Mercy, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, 7Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minne-

sota, USA, 8Medical Device Epidemiology and Real-World Data Science, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson,

New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, 9Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, 10De-

partment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA, 11National Evaluation System for Health

Technology Coordinating Center, Medical Device Innovation Consortium, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 12Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern

Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, 13Medical Device Epidemiology and

RWD Science, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA, and 14Perelman

School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Corresponding Author: Guoqian Jiang, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street,

SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA ([email protected])

Received 25 January 2021; Revised 22 April 2021; Editorial Decision 25 May 2021; Accepted 28 May 2021

ABSTRACT

Objective: The study sought to conduct an informatics analysis on the National Evaluation System for Health

Technology Coordinating Center test case of cardiac ablation catheters and to demonstrate the role of informat-

ics approaches in the feasibility assessment of capturing real-world data using unique device identifier