MINIMUM 8 FULL PAGES

Assignment/ Project Evaluation Guidelines:

Construct a framework for the evaluation of your project. Identify and describe the type of model selected for evaluation: discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model. Discuss why this model was chosen. You will then develop the tool(s) to be used to evaluate if the objective/goals, the financial aspect of the project and how the data collected will be analyzed. 

See Attached Assignment Instructions, Articles and Assignment Sample and Rubric. 

Must USE Attached Articles, in Addition to Extra Outside Resources to Complete Assignment.

2


DNP-806 PROGRAM DEV. IMPLEM & EVALUATION

MINIMUM 8 FULL PAGES

Assignment/ Project Evaluation Paper Guidelines:

Construct a framework for the evaluation of your project. Identify and describe the type of model selected for evaluation: discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model. Discuss why this model was chosen. You will then develop the tool(s) to be used to evaluate if the objective/goals, the financial aspect of the project and how the data collected will be analyzed. The final paper should not exceed eight pages 
without title page, references, and appendix.  It should be written in the APA Professional Paper Format, not the student paper format.

Complete and submit the Program Evaluation Paper (CO1, CO5) due in Week 5. Review the assignment rubric before submission: 

ATTACHED

  

See attached articles and week 5 assignment and sample paper and rubric. 

Must USE Attached Articles, in Addition to Extra Outside Resources

Articles:

1.
This article examines nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: 

Nursing Professional Experiences and Telehealth.pdf (CO1, CO5)

ATTACHED

2. This article discusses nursing participation in developing IT policy: 

Nurse engagement in healthcare IT policy.pdf  (CO1, CO5)

ATTACHED

3. This article illustrates how new, policy-driven computer work is being integrated into the value systems, social relationships, and communication patterns of interprofessional teams: 

2

DNP Scholarly Program Evaluation

Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) scholarly projects help to lead change and improve

patient outcomes within the healthcare industry. It is important to evaluate DNP scholarly

projects in order to determine if the project achieved expected outcomes. This paper uses the

goal-based model to evaluate the effectiveness of a care-team led patient mobility program. This

paper provides an evaluation of objectives, identifies how the financial aspect of the project will

be evaluated for effectiveness, and explains how data collected will be analyzed and how results

will be utilized.

Evaluation Model—Goal-Based Model

Program evaluation is an important part of completing a DNP scholarly project. Terhaar

& Sylvia (2015) explain that a project evaluation helps to support translation into practice,

replication, and dissemination. When evaluating programs, it is important to determine the

specific model for evaluation. The DNP scholarly project for using a care-team led mobility

program will be evaluated using a goal-based model.

Description of Goal-Based Model of Evaluation

The goal-based model of evaluation uses specific metrics to evaluate the effectiveness of

goals and objectives, and this model helps to identify if the intended goals are met or not met

(Pell Institute and Pathways to College Network, 2020). This model helps to answer questions

such as: 1) Did the program achieve intended outcomes? 2) What effect does the program have

on individuals involved? 3) Does the program impact individuals and populations on a larger

scale? (Pell Institute and Pathways to College Network, 2020). Furthermore, using this model of

evaluation helps to determine if the program needs modifications or improvements prior to

disseminating (Pell Institute and Pathways to College Network, 2020).

3

Rationale for Using Goal-Based Model of Evaluation

The goal-based model of evaluation is the best method to use for evaluating the

program’s goals for decreasing length of stay (LOS) and the increasing patient experience.

Inconsistency with using systematic evaluation tools is a common barrier for effectively

measuring the impact of quality improvement projects (Izumi, 2012). The rationale for using a

goal-based model of evaluation is to decrease inconsistencies for evaluating the program’s

effectiveness by providing quantitative data to support the need

70-60 POINTS

59-35 POINTS

34-25 POINTS

24-10 POINTS

9-0 POINTS

PROGRAM EVALUATIONPAPER CRITERIA

Identifies and clearly describes the type of model selected for evaluation; discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model.

Discuss why this model was chosen. Much detail included.

Clearly demonstrates how objectives will be evaluated.

Identifies how the financial aspect of the project will be evaluated for effectiveness. Much detail included.

Evaluation tools are developed well with the tool included in the appendix.

Identifies how the data collected will be analyzed and how the results will be utilized. Much detail included.

Evidence-based practice is incorporated into the project and clearly defined.

Identifies and describes the type of model selected for evaluation; discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model.

Discuss why this model was chosen. Detail included.

Demonstrates how objectives will be evaluated. Generally clear.

Identifies how the financial aspect of the project will be evaluated for effectiveness. Detail included.

Evaluation tools are developed with the tool included in the appendix.

Identifies how the data collected will be analyzed and how the results will be utilized. Detail included.

Evidence-based practice is incorporated into the project and defined. Generally clear.

Identifies and describes the type of model selected for evaluation; discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model. Lacking detail.

Discuss why this model was chosen. Lacking detail.

Demonstrates how objectives will be evaluated. Lacking detail.

Identifies how the financial aspect of the project will be evaluated for effectiveness. Lacking detail.

Evaluation tools are developed with the tool included in the appendix. Lacking detail.

Identifies how the data collected will be analyzed and how the results will be utilized. Lacking detail.

Evidence-based practice is incorporated into the project. Lacking detail.

Identifies and describes the type of model selected for evaluation; discrepancy, goal-free, transaction, goal-based or decision-making model. Lacking much de

TECHN

INFORMATICS AND HEALTH INFORMATION

OLOGY

Nurse Engagement in Health Care
Information Technology Policy

Matthew D. Byrne, PhD, RN, CPAN

THE ‘‘CARE NOT DOCUMENTED is care not

delivered’’ adage is similarly applicable to the

notion that a nurse’s voice of advocacy is lost

when not raised. The emphasis on clinical docu-

mentation having real meaning for practice and pa-

tients is one of the most important evolutionary

changes to health care information technology.

Federal and state policy reforms will guide these
changes, which in turn are shaped by input not

only from the health care–consuming public, but

by those that care for them. The unprecedented in-

vestment in health care information technology

has been built largely on the critical realization

that data can and should be used to drive down

cost while raising quality and safety. Nursing

engagement in health information technology pol-
icy is an advocacy duty. Nurses can navigate the

policy forum as clinical experts well suited to guid-

ing reform and innovation in the ongoing digital

data conversion.

Rules of Engagement

Engagement in health care reform and policy-

making often does not come naturally for registered

nurses and may seem as enjoyable as watching the

cycling of a continuous passive motion device. To

be a professional nurse in this era of rapid digital
expansion, however, requires engagement with

not just internal agency changes to practice and

policy, but the external political mechanisms that

Matthew D. Byrne, PhD, RN, CPAN, CNE, is an Assistant Pro-

fessor of Nursing, Department of Nursing, Saint Catherine

University, Saint Paul, MN.

Conflict of interest: None to report.

Address correspondence to Matthew D. Byrne, Department

of Nursing, Saint Catherine University, 2004 Randolph

Avenue, Saint Paul, MN 55105; e-mail address: mdbyrne@

stkate.edu.

� 2016 by American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses

1089-9472/$36.00

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2015.11.005

Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, Vol 31, No 1 (February), 2016: pp 99-102

churn out reforms shaping the latter. Understand-

ing, responding to, and shaping health care policy

are particularly important for the nursing profes-

sion because of the value placed on nurses as highly

ethical practitioners whose dedication and knowl-

edge warrant respect. Nurses may need to sidestep

the sometimes distasteful political gridlock and

rhetoric to engage in the policy-making process.
Engagement in health care reform pertaining to

health information technology may also introduce
<

REV I EW ART ICLE

Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and
barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic
review of qualitative studies

Marita Koivunen PhD (Adjunct Professor, Nursing Director)1,2,3 and Kaija Saranto PhD, RN (Professor)2,4

1Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Pori, Finland, 2The Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Health Care: A Joanna Briggs

Institute Centre of Excellence, 3Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland and 4Department of Health and Social Management, University of

Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland

Scand J Caring Sci; 2018; 32; 24–44

Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators

and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a

systematic review of qualitative studies

The aim of the study was to synthesise the best available

research evidence on nursing professionals’ experiences

of the facilitators and barriers to the use of online tele-

health services in nursing practice. Telehealth is used to

deliver healthcare services and health-related information

by means of information and communication technology

(ICT). The systematic review of qualitative studies was

conducted using thematic synthesis of previous studies.

International electronic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Eric,

Web of Science/Web of Knowledge and Scopus, and Fin-

nish databases Medic and Ohtanen were searched in

spring 2013. In addition, the search was complemented

in fall 2015. Following critical appraisal, 25 studies from

1998 to fall 2015 were reviewed and the findings were

synthesised. Both facilitators and barriers were grouped

into five main categories which were related to nurses’

skills and attitudes, nurses’ work and operations,

organisational factors, patients and technology. The high-

est number of facilitators and barriers was found in the

category focusing on nurses’ work and operations. Based

on the findings, nurses’ skills and attitudes are prevent-

ing factors in the implementation of telehealth. There is

also a need to focus on patients’ role in telehealth usage

although the findings support positive adoption of ICT

tools among patients. The findings call for further devel-

opment of technological tools used in nursing practice

and healthcare services. The change from traditional

face-to-face nursing to the use of telehealth calls for local

agreements and further discussions among professionals

on how this change will be accepted and implemented

into practice. In addition, organisations need to make

sure that nurses have enough resources and support for

telehealth use.

Keywords: communication, informat

lable at ScienceDirect

Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice 10 (2018) 1e5

Contents lists avai

Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice

journal homepage: http: / /www.j ieponl ine.com

Is health information technology improving interprofessional care
team communications? An ethnographic study in critical care

Myles Leslie a, b, *, Elise Paradis c, d

a Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6 Canada
b School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, 5th Floor, 906 e 8 Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 1H9 Canada
c Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy & Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3M2 Canada
d The Wilson Centre, 200 Elizabeth Street, 1ES-565, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4 Canada

a r t i c l e i n f o

Article history:
Received 1 February 2017
Received in revised form
6 October 2017
Accepted 13 October 2017

Keywords:
Health information technology
Interprofessional patient care team
Ethnography
Sociology

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

The 2009 Affordable Care Act (ACA) encouraged the ‘meaningful
use’ of Health Information Technology (HIT)1 to achieve improve-
ments in healthcare.2e6 Specifically, the Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology notes: “the main
goals of HIT adoption are to achieve improved health and health-
care quality, safety, and communication among all members of the
care team”.7 Computers in clinical spaces are thus intended to
usher in a new and improved era of care team communication and
interaction. Regardless of any changes to, or even the repeal of the
ACA, HIT systems have become a pervasive presence in US
healthcare, and are unlikely to be removed.8 Indeed, their presence
in clinical settings at the behest of the federal government is the
result of bi-partisan agreement over the course of more than a
decade that electronic health records and the infrastructure to

* Corresponding author. Department of Community Health Sciences, University
of Calgary, 3D10, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6 Canada.

E-mail address: [email protected] (M. Leslie).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2017.10.002
2405-4526/© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article u

support them are central to modernizing the US system.9

This paper uses ethnographic methods to examine the front line
communication experiences10 of care teams in two Intensive Care
Units (ICUs) with high levels of HIT adoption. Ethnography is the
systematic observation of people living and making sense of their
lives in a specific cultural or organiz

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Nursing Research

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apnr

Original article

Estimating the association between burnout and electronic health record-
related stress among advanced practice registered nurses

Daniel A. Harris, MPHa,c, Jacqueline Haskell, MSc, Emily Cooper, MPHc,⁎, Nancy Crouse, CNSd,
Rebekah Gardner, MDb,c

a Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
bWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
cHealthcentric Advisors, Providence, RI, United States of America
d Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America

A R T I C L E I N F O

Keywords:
APRN
Burnout
Electronic health record
Health information technology

A B S T R A C T

Background: Health information technology (HIT), such as electronic health records (EHRs), is a growing part of
the clinical landscape. Recent studies among physicians suggest that HIT is associated with a higher prevalence
of burnout. Few studies have investigated the workflow and practice-level predictors of burnout among ad-
vanced practice registered nurses (APRNs).
Aim: Characterize HIT use and measure associations between EHR-related stress and burnout among APRNs.
Methods: An electronic survey was administered to all APRNs licensed in Rhode Island, United States
(N= 1197) in May–June 2017. The dependent variable was burnout, measured with the validated Mini z
burnout survey. The main independent variables were three EHR-related stress measures: time spent on the EHR
at home, daily frustration with the EHR, and time for documentation. Logistic regression was used to measure
the association between EHR-related stress and burnout before and after adjusting for demographics, practice-
level characteristics, and the other EHR-related stress measures.
Results: Of the 371 participants, 73 (19.8%) reported at least one symptom of burnout. Among participants with
an EHR (N=333), 165 (50.3%) agreed or strongly agreed that the EHR added to their daily frustration and 97
(32.8%) reported an insufficient amount of time for documentation. After adjustment, insufficient time for
documentation (AOR=3.72 (1.78–7.80)) and the EHR adding to daily frustration (AOR=2.17 (1.02–4.65))
remained predictors of burnout.
Conclusions: Results from the present study revealed several EHR-related environmental factors are associated
with burnout among APRNs. Future studies may explore the impact of addressing these EHR-related factors to
mitigate burnout among this population.

1. Introduction

Resulting from chronic job-related stress, burnout is characterized
by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased job sa-
tisfaction (Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter, 2001). Given the high-stress
nature of clinical environments,