I need help with a draft of my project proposal 

Questions

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you will synthesize the independent evidence-based practice project proposal assignments from NUR-550 and NUR-590 into a 4,500-5,000-word professional paper.

Final Paper

The final paper should:

Incorporate all necessary revisions and corrections suggested by your instructors.

Synthesize the different elements of the overall project into one paper. The synthesis should reflect the main concepts for each section, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and be rewritten to include the critical aspects (do not copy and paste the assignments).

Contain supporting research for the evidence-based practice project proposal.

Main Body of the Paper

The main body of your paper should include the following sections:

Problem Statement

Organizational Culture and Readiness

Literature Review

Change Model, or Framework

Implementation Plan

Evaluation Plan

Appendices

The appendices at the end of your paper should include the following:

All final changes or revisions for the drafts that will be included in the appendices of your paper.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as the final appendix at the end of your paper. In each preceding course you have been directed to the Student Success Center for assistance with APA style, and have submitted the APA Writing Checklist to help illustrate your adherence to APA style. This final paper should demonstrate a clear ability to communicate your project in a professional and accurately formatted paper using APA style.

General Requirements

You are required to cite 10-12 peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nur

4

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Evaluation Plan

Kieran M Njobe

Grand Canyon University: <590>

<11/23/2021>

Running head: ASSIGNMENT TITLE HERE

1

Evaluation Plan

Interventions of Managing Hypertension



Program Evaluation: Interventions of Managing Hypertension

Program Background and Expected Outcomes

Management of hypertension requires a very strategic approach in such a way that implementation of change or outcome development is precise and successful, otherwise, it could be mute. The applicable intervention for this health issue is the use of digital technology with social cognitive hence a look at the definition of personal experiences, behavior, and medical behavior environment. Therefore, the outcome of the intervention that is presented is to make sure that there is improvement in the data use to improve patient care and medication in hypertension patients hence reducing deaths and CVDs related complications (Fort et al., 2021).

Evaluation Design

The project completion is determined by a need for monitoring throughout from the point of admission to the outcome determination. As such, the understanding of the change throughout the time will be actualized through the utilization of outcome development within strategy reformation. The long-term applicability of the design for the evaluation allows for progressive determination of caregiving to hypertension patients. Therefore, the evaluation design that would be used in this project will be randomized tests. The randomization involved the control of source for bias in a way that allows confidence in the outcomes from the patients. The aim is to improve the extent of nursing care and thus the involvement of the healthcare practitioners in changing the system in a way that allows leveling up on the change in behavior towards data use in hypertension medication (Patel. et al., 2021).

Evaluation Needs

The program intends to allow for prevention of the diseases that could lead to death. In the utilization of the digital intervention, the development of medication is the end goal within the twelve months. In this way, the use of mixed-methods evaluation procedures that would be employed is the outcome evaluation with the integration of impact evaluation (Huber, 2011). Therefore, looking at the indicators, the outcome evaluation, the aspect to consider are:

· Changes that have occurred during the par

Running Head: INTERVENTIONS OF MANAGING HYPERTENSION

INTERVENTIONS OF MANAGING HYPERTENSION

Rubric

Synthesis Paragraphs are logically sequenced, connect ideas or overreaching concepts, and are rewritten to present a fluid and cohesive paper. Synthesis is excellent. The paper organizes paragraphs in a logical sequence and connects ideas or overreaching concepts. The paper is well-developed, fluid, and cohesive.

Criteria Description

Organizational Culture and Readiness Culture, degree of readiness, challenges to implementation, strategies for implementation, stakeholder involvement, communication strategies.

5. 5: Excellent

10.5 points

The organizational culture and readiness are thoroughly discussed and insight into the organization challenges is presented. Clear strategies for communication, stakeholder involvement, and the implementation of the evidence-based practice project proposal are presented. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.

Criteria Description

Problem Statement (C5.1a)

5. 5: Excellent

12 points

The problem statement is consistent throughout the paper and concisely describes the issue using strong evidence-based support to rationalize and justify the problem.

Literature Review

10.5 points

Criteria Description

Literature Review

5. 5: Excellent

10.5 points

The supporting literature from the literature review is organized and synthesized strategically throughout the paper to provide convincing evidence. The main components of the articles are used to provide substantial rationale for how the research supports the PICOT.

Change Model or Framework

5. 5: Excellent

10.5 points

The selected model or framework and its application for the proposed implementation are thoroughly described

Plan includes setting/access to subjects; timeline; budget and resources; research design; methods instruments; process for delivering intervention; stakeholders; barriers and challenges. (C5.1b)

5. 5: Excellent

10.5 points

The implementation plan is thoroughly described and provides the details for the various aspects. Thorough explanations and strong supporting evidence are provided.

Evaluation Plan Plan includes expected outcomes, data collection tools, statistical test, methods applied to data collection tool, strategies for nonpositive outcomes, plans for maintaining, extending, revising and discontinuing proposed solution.

5. 5: Excellent

10.5 p